Comparison

FullGTM vs Clay

Clay is excellent at what it does. The question isn't whether the tool is good — it's who is going to run it. This page lays out both sides, including where Clay is the better choice.

Request a free sample
Full disclosure

Full disclosure before anything else

We're FullGTM, so we have a side. We also use data providers ourselves, and we think Clay is genuinely the category leader in enrichment — $3.1B valuation, 200+ data providers, 4.7/5 on G2, used by OpenAI and Anthropic. The difference isn't quality. It's the model: Clay sells software your team operates; we sell the outcome, operated by us.

Side by side

Side by side, feature by feature

CapabilityClayFullGTM
What you're buyingSoftware you operateA department that operates it for you
Multi-provider enrichmentYes — 200+ providers, category leaderYes, as an internal input of the service
Sends email campaignsYes — native Sequencer, max 4 steps per sequenceYes — no tool-imposed step limit
Domains & mailboxesYou connect your own (OAuth/SMTP); warmup via poolProvisioned and managed for you
Managed deliverabilityWarmup and rotation features — the operation is yoursMonitored and run by our team
Who builds and maintains the workflowsYou — or one of the 175 certified agenciesWe do
Learning curve for your team"Steep learning curve for new users" (G2)None — you don't touch the system
Strategy, ICP and messagingNot included — it's infrastructureIncluded in the service
Predictable monthly costActions don't roll over; 0.5–10+ credits per record; top-ups at +30%Fixed monthly fee
What happens when credits run out"Workflows stop" until you top up or upgradeNot your problem — consumption is on our side
Scale and market validation$3.1B valuation, $204M raised, 10k+ customersBoutique, operated — fewer clients, deeper ownership

Data verified on clay.com, their documentation and G2 as of July 25, 2026. Clay restructured its plans on March 11, 2026 — figures reflect the current plans (Free / Launch / Growth / Enterprise).

Where we win

Where we win

Nobody on your team has to become a Clay expert

Clay is powerful enough that an entire industry exists to operate it: Clay's own partner directory lists 175 certified consultancies, and G2 has a 'Consulting Services for Clay' category. That's the honest tell — the tool needs an operator. With us, the operator is us.

One fixed fee instead of a variable credit bill

Clay runs on two consumption currencies: Actions (which don't roll over) and Data Credits (0.5 to 10+ per record, depending on the data). Top-ups cost a 30% premium, and when you run out, your workflows stop. Our fee is fixed and the data consumption sits on our side of the line.

Strategy is part of the service, not a prerequisite

Clay gives you infrastructure: you still need to define the ICP, the signals, the messaging and the sequence logic. We bring the playbooks and the strategy, and we're accountable for the pipeline, not for the tables.

The whole motion, not one layer of it

Clay covers enrichment and sending. We cover the ICP, the research, the copy, deliverability infrastructure, reply handling, CRM write-back — plus content and web operations if you want them. One team, one number to call.

Where Clay is the better choice

Cost

The real cost comparison

Clay starts at $167/mo (Launch) and $446/mo (Growth) as shown on their pricing page — genuinely cheaper than us on the invoice. But the honest comparison is total cost: the licence, plus the credits you'll actually burn, plus the person who operates it — either an internal hire or one of those 175 agencies. Add those up and compare against a single fixed retainer where all of it is included. Sometimes Clay still wins that math. When it does, we'll tell you.

Questions

Frequent questions

Is FullGTM built on top of Clay?

No. We run our own outbound system with our own data providers and playbooks. Clay is a competitor at the category level, not a dependency.

Doesn't Clay also send emails?

Yes, it does — Clay has a native Sequencer that runs campaigns from your tables (up to 4 steps per sequence). The difference isn't whether the tool can send; it's who configures the domains, warms them up, watches deliverability and writes each message.

We already pay for Clay. Can you work with it?

Talk to us. If your Clay setup is working, the honest answer may be to keep it and have us cover what it doesn't — content, web operations, or the operating layer on top.

Which is cheaper?

On the invoice, Clay. On total cost, it depends on what you'd pay the person who operates it. We'll do that math with you honestly, including the case where you shouldn't hire us.

Don't take our word for it. See the work.

We'll send three real outbound emails written for prospects in your ICP, plus the signals behind each one — in 24 hours, no call required. Then compare that against what you'd build yourself.

Request a free sample